Companion Animals

Reward-Based Training Methods and Dog Welfare

The scientific evidence strongly supports reward-based training as both more effective and more welfare-positive than aversive methods.

Key Facts

Meta-analyses confirm reward-based training is at least as effective as aversive methods
Dogs trained with aversive methods show higher anxiety and stress indicators
Reward-based training maintains dog engagement and strengthens human-dog relationship
The use of shock collars is associated with increased aggression and fear in dogs
CAWC recommends avoiding aversive training tools and methods in all dog training

Welfare Considerations

The scientific evidence supporting reward-based training is strong and consistent. Dogs trained with positive reinforcement show better welfare indicators, lower cortisol levels, and more positive engagement with training compared to those trained with aversive methods. The equivalent or superior effectiveness of reward-based training means there is no welfare justification for aversive methods.

What You Can Do

Choose accredited reward-based trainers for your dog
Avoid shock collars, prong collars, and other aversive training tools
Report the use of aversive training methods to professional bodies
Support legislation banning shock collar use in the UK and internationally
Advocate for reward-based training requirements in dog welfare standards and guidelines