Cosmetic animal testing bans have spread globally since the EU led the way in 2013, but significant gaps remain. Understanding the global picture helps focus advocacy effectively.
Cosmetic animal testing causes suffering for what are, by any standard, non-essential products. Animals used in safety testing experience skin and eye irritation, systemic toxicity, and are killed at the end of testing. As non-animal alternatives become available and regulatory accepted, continued reliance on animal testing reflects regulatory inertia more than genuine scientific necessity. The global patchwork of bans and exemptions means companies selling in multiple markets may still conduct animal testing for those market segments, funding ongoing suffering for cosmetic products.