Static enrichment loses effectiveness rapidly — pig welfare requires regular enrichment rotation to maintain engagement.
Providing enrichment once and leaving it indefinitely is welfare-neutral over time — pigs adapt to and ignore familiar objects rapidly. The welfare benefit of enrichment comes from novelty: the opportunity to investigate, manipulate, and root in something new. Enrichment rotation maintains this novelty at minimal cost, turning a static welfare provision into a dynamic one. The practical implication for welfare policy is that enrichment requirements should specify regular replacement or rotation, not just presence — distinguishing meaningful enrichment from token compliance.