Wild Animals

Human-Wildlife Conflict: Protecting Both Livestock and Wildlife

Predators killing livestock create genuine welfare and economic harm for farmers while retaliatory killing threatens wildlife populations. Solutions exist that protect both.

Key Facts

Welfare Considerations

Human-wildlife conflict creates welfare harms on multiple sides. Livestock that survive predator attacks may suffer serious injuries requiring veterinary treatment or causing slow death. Predators killed retaliatorily die from shooting, poisoning, or trapping — methods that frequently cause prolonged suffering. The underlying tension is economic: farmers bear real costs from predation that are externalized from the broader society that benefits from predator presence through ecosystem function and biodiversity. Solutions that reduce predation risk through prevention — guardian animals, electric fencing, night corralling, and light deterrents — while compensating farmers fairly for verified losses can dramatically reduce both livestock suffering and predator killing.

What You Can Do