Sow Gestation Crate Reform Progress

Gestation crates for sows have become one of the most visible farm animal welfare battles, with significant global progress but persistent resistance.

Key Facts

Gestation crates confine pregnant sows in spaces barely larger than their bodies for most of their pregnancy
The EU banned gestation crates in 2013 except for the first four weeks of pregnancy
California Proposition 12 requires sows in pork sold in California to be kept crate-free
Over 100 major food companies have committed to going crate-free in their supply chains
Group housing for sows requires careful management to prevent aggression but is achievable at scale

Welfare Considerations

The gestation crate represents one of the clearest examples of a welfare intervention that is both achievable and meaningful. Sows in crates show extremely high rates of stereotypic behaviors, indicating severe psychological distress. The transition to group housing eliminates the most extreme behavioral deprivation while allowing sows to move, root, and maintain social relationships. Progress on crate elimination has been driven by corporate commitments responding to consumer pressure, demonstrating the power of market campaigns.

What You Can Do

Support only restaurants and retailers with time-bound crate-free commitments
Check food companies for their gestation crate commitments before purchasing pork
Advocate for state and national legislation requiring crate-free sow housing
Support organizations tracking and publicizing corporate crate-free commitments
Reduce pork consumption to lower overall demand for intensive sow housing systems