Shifting to plant-based diets is widely cited as the most effective individual action to reduce farmed animal suffering, though the full welfare calculation involves additional considerations.
The welfare case for plant-based diets rests on the enormous scale of suffering in industrial animal agriculture. Reducing or eliminating animal product consumption reduces individual contribution to this suffering through market mechanisms, even if the relationship between individual demand and farm-level production decisions is indirect. The welfare case is strongest for intensively produced animal products including battery cage eggs, factory farmed chicken and pork, and high-input dairy. It is weaker but not absent for low-intensity pastoral systems where animal welfare is better managed. Complete welfare calculation includes wild animal impacts of crop agriculture and is complex, but the overall welfare benefit of plant-based diets relative to conventional omnivorous diets is well-supported by evidence.