Mink farming has been banned in numerous European countries on welfare grounds, while remaining active in others. The welfare case against fur farming involves the incompatibility of mink natural behaviour with commercial cage systems.
The welfare case for banning mink farming is among the clearest in livestock welfare debate: the natural behavioural repertoire of mink — wide-ranging semi-aquatic predators requiring large territories and access to water — is fundamentally incompatible with commercial cage housing. Stereotypic behaviour prevalence in commercial mink exceeds 50% in most studied populations, indicating that chronic psychological distress is not an aberration but a systemic feature of the production system. Unlike some intensive livestock systems where welfare improvement through enrichment and management is possible within the production model, mink welfare requirements cannot be met in any cage-based commercial system because the space and water access needs are simply incompatible with economic production. Countries that have banned mink farming have made this assessment and acted on it; the welfare case for others to follow is well-founded.