Urban Wildlife

Coyote Conflict and Coexistence: Urban Wildlife Welfare on the Edges

Coyotes have colonized cities across North America, creating human-wildlife conflicts. Understanding their ecology and behavior supports welfare-compatible coexistence strategies.

Key Facts

Welfare Considerations

Coyote conflict management raises welfare questions for both coyotes and the pets and livestock they occasionally prey upon. Lethal removal of individual coyotes is both welfare-costly and ecologically counterproductive — it removes specific animals from a population that immediately recruits replacements. Hazing programs that reinforce natural wariness of humans protect both humans and coyotes by maintaining behavioral boundaries that reduce conflict. Food conditioning — when well-meaning humans feed coyotes — is the most direct pathway to welfare harm for coyotes, as conditioned animals are killed as a management response. The welfare of individual coyotes and the safety of pets and humans converge on the same behavioral management approach: hazing, not feeding, and securing attractants.

What You Can Do