Expanding urban coyote populations in North American cities require management approaches that balance human safety concerns with the welfare of individual coyotes, avoiding lethal control methods that have been shown to be ineffective at reducing populations.
Urban coyote management is a test case for welfare-positive wildlife coexistence policy. Lethal control is ineffective, welfare-negative, and supported by public sentiment that underestimates coyote adaptability. Hazing and coexistence management are more effective at reducing conflict, welfare-positive for individual coyotes, and aligned with the ecological services coyotes provide. The welfare goal is not eliminating coyotes from cities but maintaining a balanced relationship where coyotes retain natural wariness of humans, conflicts are minimised through habitat modification and feeding deterrence, and individual coyotes are not unnecessarily killed for normal wild behaviour. This requires sustained public education, policy support, and willingness to live alongside native wildlife.