The barefoot horse movement advocates for keeping horses unshod, arguing that natural hoof function improves horse welfare, though evidence and appropriate candidate selection require careful consideration.
The barefoot debate involves genuine welfare considerations on both sides. Advocates argue that shoeing restricts natural hoof mechanism function and that barefoot horses on appropriate management show better hoof health, reduced navicular problems and improved proprioception. Critics note that domestic horses often work on surfaces and at intensities that natural hooves cannot accommodate without protection. The welfare evidence supports a nuanced position: barefoot management can be welfare-positive for suitable horses on appropriate management, but forced barefoot transition for horses with poor hoof quality or on demanding work surfaces causes foot soreness and lameness. Individual assessment by qualified professionals rather than ideological commitment to either position serves horse welfare best.