Road networks cause the deaths of millions of wild animals annually. Effective mitigation measures exist but are inconsistently implemented. Understanding the evidence supports better infrastructure policy.
Road mortality causes immense but largely invisible welfare harm to wild animals. Vehicle strikes are rarely instantly fatal — injured animals commonly die slowly from trauma, and injured adults leave dependent young to starve. The suffering is diffuse and geographically dispersed, making it easy to overlook compared to more visible threats. The evidence base for mitigation is strong: wildlife crossing structures, properly designed and fenced, dramatically reduce mortality at known hotspots. The barrier to implementation is political and economic — crossing structures are expensive and require cross-agency coordination between transport authorities and conservation bodies. Making wildlife-sensitive road design a standard requirement in infrastructure planning rather than a post-hoc addition would significantly reduce road-mortality welfare impacts across affected species.