Bottom trawling disturbs vast areas of seabed, harming the marine invertebrates and fish that live there. The welfare implications of this dominant fishing method extend to billions of individual animals annually.
Bottom trawling presents a scale of welfare harm that dwarfs almost any other human activity in terms of individual animals affected. The seafloor communities disrupted by trawl gear contain millions of sentient or potentially sentient animals per square kilometre — crustaceans with nociception, molluscs with varying degrees of neural complexity, and the fish and invertebrates killed as bycatch. The welfare case for restricting bottom trawling in ecologically sensitive areas is strong both on individual welfare grounds and on the basis of preserving the ecosystem welfare of marine communities. Consumer choices — selecting line-caught, pot-caught, and certified sustainable seafood over trawl-caught alternatives — reduce individual purchasing contribution to trawling demand and create market signals for lower-impact fishing methods.