Providing protein alternatives to communities dependent on wild primate bushmeat is one of the most effective welfare interventions — reducing hunting pressure while addressing genuine food security needs.
The welfare case for bushmeat alternative programs addresses both the welfare of hunted primates and the food security needs of human communities. Prohibitionist approaches that criminalize subsistence hunting without providing alternatives transfer food insecurity to human communities while failing to prevent hunting. Programs that engage communities as partners — providing aquaculture facilities, chicken flocks, or legume agriculture — create genuine protein alternatives that communities choose voluntarily. The welfare outcome is better for primates, and food security outcomes improve for humans.