Recreational fishing is one of the most widespread human-wildlife interactions, and evidence that fish experience pain has prompted growing scrutiny of angling practices — particularly the welfare implications of catch-and-release fishing.
The ethics of recreational fishing are being re-examined in light of growing scientific evidence that fish experience pain. Catch-and-release, often presented as the welfare-conscious choice, extends the period of pain and stress rather than ending it quickly, and can cause delayed mortality not captured in immediate release assessments. The welfare implications of angling do not necessarily demand that all fishing cease, but they do demand that anglers minimise harm through equipment choices, handling practices, and honest engagement with the evidence about fish pain. Best practice angling — barbless hooks, wet hands, minimal air exposure — can substantially reduce welfare harm.