Millions of small fish species including zebrafish, medaka and sticklebacks are used in research with minimal welfare oversight compared to mammals, despite growing evidence of their capacity for suffering.
Small fish in research suffer the double disadvantage of uncertain sentience and minimal regulatory protection. While scientific evidence for fish pain and stress has grown substantially, small species used in developmental biology and genetics research remain outside welfare frameworks in many jurisdictions. The practical barriers to improving their welfare are low — group housing, appropriate water quality, anaesthesia for procedures and humane euthanasia are all achievable without compromising research validity. The primary barrier is cultural: the assumption that these animals do not matter enough to warrant welfare consideration. Shifting this assumption through education, regulatory inclusion and institutional policy change would benefit enormous numbers of animals at low cost.