Companion Animals

Dog Training Methods and Welfare: The Evidence Base

The training methods used with dogs have direct welfare implications — aversive techniques cause stress and fear while positive reinforcement achieves equivalent or better outcomes.

Key Facts

Welfare Considerations

How we train dogs is a welfare choice. The evidence is now sufficient to state clearly: aversive training causes suffering, generalises beyond the training context to increase chronic anxiety, and provides no benefit over positive reinforcement methods in terms of training outcomes. The persistence of aversive methods reflects tradition, commercial interests and misconceptions about dominance and pack structure that are not supported by current ethological science. The welfare case for positive reinforcement is not just about kindness — it is about evidence-based practice that produces better-trained, better-adjusted dogs with lower stress profiles. Supporting policy that restricts aversive devices and promoting positive training education are both achievable welfare improvements.

What You Can Do