Brown bears in Europe and North America are recovering in range but face increasing human conflict as populations expand into agricultural landscapes, with welfare implications on both sides.
Bears killed in retaliation for livestock depredation or deemed too dangerous after human encounters represent direct welfare losses. The stress of navigating human-dominated landscapes, avoiding people, and having traditional food sources disrupted by development also represents chronic welfare costs for individual bears. Coexistence programs that combine compensation for livestock losses, bear-proof storage of attractants, and electric fencing of vulnerable assets are the most effective at reducing both bear welfare costs and human conflict — treating the problem as a shared challenge rather than a zero-sum conflict.