Mulesing is a controversial surgical procedure used to prevent flystrike in Merino sheep that causes significant pain while protecting against a deadly welfare problem.
Mulesing presents a genuine welfare dilemma: the procedure causes acute and chronic pain but prevents the arguably worse welfare outcome of flystrike. Studies using pain indicators confirm significant suffering during and after mulesing without analgesia. New Zealand demonstrates that alternatives including selective breeding for bare-breeched genetics, chemical prevention protocols, and husbandry changes can replace mulesing entirely. The welfare position is clear: mulesing should be replaced by alternatives rather than continued without pain relief. The transition requires investment in selective breeding and changed management that the industry has been slow to make.