Mice are the most commonly used laboratory animals. Social housing is essential for mouse welfare but implementation faces practical challenges that research is helping to address.
Social isolation is one of the most significant and avoidable welfare harms in laboratory mouse housing. The historical practice of individually housing mice for experimental control was based on assumptions that social housing creates unacceptable variability, but research increasingly shows that social housing does not compromise experimental validity while dramatically improving welfare. Male mouse aggression in group housing is manageable through stable group formation, sufficient space, and environmental complexity. The growing use of validated welfare assessment tools including facial grimace scales enables researchers to monitor and respond to welfare problems more effectively. Institutional commitment to social housing as the default for mice represents a high-impact, low-cost welfare improvement.