Scientific research on pig space allowances provides clear evidence that current regulatory minimums are insufficient for good welfare, and the gap between law and welfare science is significant.
The space allowance research literature presents a consistent picture: welfare improves as space increases, and current regulatory minimums were set at levels that prioritize economic efficiency over welfare science. The research evidence for this is not subtle — moving from regulatory minimums to welfare-science-recommended levels produces measurable reductions in injury, stereotypic behavior, and physiological stress across multiple studies and species. The gap between regulatory minimums and higher welfare certification standards reflects the translation of this research into market incentives rather than legislation. The EU has been slow to update space regulations despite clear EFSA scientific recommendations. Consumer demand for certified higher welfare products, and retailer commitment to requiring higher welfare supply chains, represents the most immediate pathway to improving the conditions under which the majority of pigs live.