Wool production involves welfare challenges throughout the sheep year, from the stress of shearing to the painful practice of mulesing in Australian Merino flocks.
Wool production welfare is dominated by the mulesing debate in Australia but encompasses broader welfare challenges across the sheep year. Mulesing represents a genuine welfare dilemma: the practice causes significant acute pain during and after the procedure, but the flystrike it prevents also causes severe suffering. The welfare case against mulesing relies not on ignoring flystrike risk but on arguing that alternatives including selective breeding, chemical prevention, and management practices can achieve equivalent flystrike protection without surgical mutilation. The success of New Zealand producers in eliminating mulesing while maintaining viable flocks demonstrates that alternatives are effective. The persistence of mulesing in Australia reflects the scale of the challenge of breeding transition in large flocks, but the welfare trajectory is clearly toward elimination.