Wild Animal Welfare

Bovine Tuberculosis Badger Culling: Welfare, Evidence, and Policy

The badger culling programme in Britain to control bovine tuberculosis raises profound welfare questions while epidemiological evidence for its effectiveness remains contested.

Key Facts

Welfare Considerations

Badger culling for bTB control presents a case where welfare harm to a protected wildlife species is justified by agricultural disease control objectives, yet the epidemiological evidence for effectiveness is genuinely weak. The welfare harm of controlled shooting is not trivial: injury rates from non-instantaneous death are higher than in comparable game shooting, badger social group disruption causes chronic stress, and the perturbation effect may actually worsen disease spread. Against this welfare cost, the disease control benefit appears limited: the Independent Scientific Group reviewed the evidence and concluded that culling could not meaningfully contribute to bTB control at a national level. Vaccination offers a welfare-neutral alternative that does not cause population disruption and has growing evidence of effectiveness, making continued culling difficult to justify on either welfare or epidemiological grounds.

What You Can Do