Gestation crates confining pregnant sows in spaces too small to turn around have been banned or restricted in many jurisdictions, but their phase-out remains incomplete and contested globally.
Gestation crate welfare science is among the most comprehensive in farmed animal welfare, consistently demonstrating that the physical restriction of crates causes both physical and psychological suffering. Sows in gestation crates cannot express any natural movement behaviors, experience chronic musculoskeletal problems from forced inactivity, and show neurotic stereotypic behaviors at extremely high rates indicating psychological frustration. The scientific case for banning gestation crates is unambiguous. However, transition to group housing requires farm infrastructure investment and management skill improvements for aggression control, creating economic barriers that have slowed adoption even where legally required. Industry and retailer commitments to phase-out have been made and then delayed repeatedly, requiring continued advocacy pressure to maintain momentum.