Wild boar populations are expanding across Europe and North America, driving conflict with agriculture and raising complex welfare and management questions. Lethal and non-lethal approaches each have distinct welfare implications for individual animals and populations.
Wild boar culling causes individual animal suffering, particularly when wounding occurs without immediate retrieval. Snare-based control causes prolonged stress and injury. Disease-related culls for African Swine Fever control raise additional welfare concerns when entire family groups are eliminated. From a welfare perspective, lethal control should use methods that minimise time to death, and non-lethal approaches including exclusion fencing, crop protection, and fertility control should be explored where feasible. The sentience and social intelligence of wild boar means that population-level decisions carry genuine individual welfare costs that deserve explicit acknowledgement in management planning.