Foot-and-mouth disease causes severe oral and foot pain in cattle and triggers mass culling policies that raise profound welfare questions during outbreak responses.
FMD causes genuine and significant suffering — cattle with severe lesions cannot eat, drink, or stand without pain. However, the welfare calculus of outbreak response is complex: mass culling of millions of animals, including healthy ones, raises serious ethical questions about proportionality. The prioritisation of trade status over vaccination reflects economic rather than welfare logic. Fire-fighting culls performed under time pressure sometimes fail to meet basic welfare standards for humane slaughter. Higher-welfare outbreak responses would include greater use of emergency vaccination, welfare-focused triage, and humane slaughter protocols that ensure animals do not suffer unnecessarily before or during killing.