Antarctic krill are among the most abundant animals on Earth, forming the foundation of Southern Ocean food webs — and their welfare during fishing and their ecological role raise questions about how we should treat invertebrates at scale.
Krill welfare raises the invertebrate sentience question at enormous scale. If individual krill have even limited capacity for suffering, commercial fishing and the ecological disruption from climate change affects them at a scale dwarfing all vertebrate welfare concerns combined. The uncertainty about krill experience is genuine and unlikely to be resolved quickly. A precautionary approach — treating potential suffering seriously given uncertainty — argues for minimising krill mortality from fishing where alternatives exist and for prioritising ocean protection that maintains ecosystem health. The ecological argument for krill protection — maintaining the food web foundation of the Southern Ocean — is strong regardless of welfare conclusions.