Pain in livestock is frequently unrecognised and undertreated, partly because prey animals evolved to hide illness and partly because traditional farming culture minimised animal pain as a welfare concern.
The recognition of pain in livestock is both a science and a cultural challenge. Scientifically, prey animal stoicism means that conventional observation misses significant pain: an animal that continues to eat and move around may still be experiencing moderate to severe pain detectable only through detailed behavioural and physiological assessment. Culturally, farming traditions in many regions historically viewed livestock pain as less morally significant than companion animal pain, leading to professional norms where routine painful procedures were performed without analgesia. Pain assessment tools like grimace scales have transformed what is detectable, making it harder to claim an animal is "fine" when its facial expression reveals the opposite. Integrating these tools into routine farm management and veterinary practice is the key translational challenge.