Clear, meaningful welfare labelling on animal products empowers consumers to make informed choices, but current labelling systems are often confusing, inconsistent, or misleading.
The gap between what consumers think they are buying and what animal welfare labelling actually guarantees is substantial. "Free-range" means different things in different countries and for different species. "Organic" sets environmental standards but may not prevent practices like beak trimming or painful procedures. Welfare labelling systems with rigorous, audited standards and clear tiered communication give consumers the information they need to align purchases with their values. The market potential of honest welfare labelling is significant: surveys consistently show a majority of consumers would pay more for verified higher-welfare products. The barrier is primarily political — industry resistance to transparency requirements that would reveal the gap between marketing language and production reality.