Stranded whales, dolphins, and seals face complex welfare decisions about treatment, refloating, or euthanasia. Evidence-based protocols balance individual welfare against realistic recovery prospects.
Stranded marine mammals present urgent welfare decisions under time pressure. Animals that appear alive may be suffering from injuries, disease, or physiological stress that makes recovery impossible. Prolonged survival attempts that extend suffering without realistic recovery prospects are ethically problematic. Conversely, premature euthanasia of animals that could be rehabilitated wastes welfare potential and public trust. Good stranding response requires rapid veterinary assessment using validated triage criteria, clear euthanasia decision thresholds, and methods capable of achieving rapid insensibility in very large animals. For mass strandings, the welfare calculus involves large numbers: optimising the outcome for the group rather than attempting futile individual interventions for all.