Gestation crates confine pregnant sows in spaces so small they cannot turn around. Despite widespread acknowledgement of the welfare harm, elimination of crates remains incomplete globally.
Gestation crates represent a clear case where animal welfare science and industry practice have diverged dramatically. The welfare harm is unambiguous — confinement so extreme that an animal cannot perform any natural movement is incompatible with basic welfare standards. The transition to group housing, while more management-intensive, is demonstrably achievable at commercial scale. Progress has been driven by a combination of regulatory bans, corporate commitments under consumer pressure, and welfare certification schemes. The challenge is that progress is geographically uneven — major pork-producing regions including parts of the US, China, and Brazil still rely heavily on gestation crates. International trade agreements and consumer purchasing decisions in importing countries can exert significant pressure for reform.