Farm Animal Welfare

Group Housing Systems for Pregnant Sows: Welfare Evidence

Group housing of pregnant sows — replacing individual gestation stalls — is now required across much of Europe and increasingly adopted globally. The welfare evidence strongly supports well-managed group systems.

Key Facts

Welfare Considerations

The welfare evidence supporting group housing over gestation stalls is robust. Sows in individual stalls cannot turn around, perform rooting, maintain normal posture, or engage in social behaviour — the confinement causes chronic frustration measurable through stereotypic bar-biting, elevated stress hormones, and musculoskeletal deterioration from inability to stand and move normally. Group housed sows show significantly lower rates of stereotypic behaviour, better musculoskeletal health, and more natural time budgets. The welfare challenge of group housing — aggression at mixing — is manageable through good practice: electronic sow feeders eliminate competitive feeding stress; adequate floor space (2.25 m³ per sow minimum in EU systems) allows avoidance; and stable group composition after initial mixing reduces ongoing aggression. Bedded loose-housing systems with straw provide rooting opportunity and significantly improve welfare outcomes over concrete-slatted group systems. The transition from stalls to well-managed group housing represents one of the most significant farm animal welfare improvements in recent decades.

What You Can Do