As cities expand, wildlife increasingly encounters humans in residential and commercial areas. Managing these conflicts humanely requires understanding animal behaviour and community engagement.
Urban wildlife welfare is shaped by the collision of human infrastructure with animal territorial and feeding needs. Animals that enter urban spaces face multiple welfare hazards: vehicle strikes, toxic bait exposure, entanglement in fencing and netting, and removal by lethal control. At the same time, some urban species access reliable food resources and face fewer predators — creating complex welfare trade-offs. Conflict management that relies on lethal control is both ethically problematic and often ineffective in the long term. Non-lethal coexistence approaches — securing food waste, wildlife-proofing buildings, hazing habitually bold individuals, and community education — address the underlying drivers of conflict while avoiding the welfare cost of lethal removal. The key ethical commitment is to prevent the conditions that create conflict rather than simply eliminating animals when conflict occurs.