Managing infectious diseases in wildlife populations involves difficult welfare trade-offs between individual animal suffering and population or ecosystem health.
Wildlife disease management forces confrontation with the tension between population-level conservation goals and individual animal welfare. Culling healthy animals to prevent disease spread causes real harm to individuals; so does allowing disease to spread and kill thousands of animals slowly. Vaccination is often preferable from a welfare perspective but is not always feasible at scale. A welfare-informed approach to wildlife disease would prioritise minimising suffering at the individual level, investing in vaccination research, improving surveillance to enable early detection, and evaluating culling programmes against evidence rather than tradition.