The barefoot movement has generated significant discussion about whether traditional horseshoeing serves or harms horse welfare, with evidence supporting both managed barefoot and appropriate shoeing depending on individual circumstances.
The debate between barefoot and shod approaches centres on what best serves individual horse welfare rather than ideology. Evidence suggests that well-managed barefoot horses on appropriate terrain can develop excellent hoof quality with better sensory feedback and natural movement. However, horses on hard surfaces, with certain conformational issues, or in demanding work may benefit from appropriate protective shoeing. The worst welfare outcomes occur when either approach is implemented without proper assessment, skilled trimming, appropriate diet, and sufficient movement. Owners should work with qualified farriers and vets to determine what genuinely serves each individual horse.