Farm Animal Welfare

Pig Farrowing Systems: Comparing Welfare Outcomes Across Housing Approaches

The type of farrowing system — conventional crate, temporary restraint, loose housing, or outdoor — significantly affects the welfare of both sows and piglets during one of the most welfare-critical production periods.

Key Facts

Welfare Considerations

Farrowing system choice encapsulates one of the most painful welfare trade-offs in pig production: the severe, prolonged welfare cost to sows confined in conventional crates versus the increased crushing risk to piglets in free systems. Welfare science has moved toward resolving this trade-off rather than accepting it: loose farrowing systems with good design — appropriate crate width, comfortable substrate, good stockperson training — can achieve piglet mortality rates comparable to conventional crates while substantially improving sow welfare. The direction of welfare policy is clear in progressive jurisdictions: farrowing crate bans are increasing. Supporting the transition to better farrowing systems through purchasing choices and advocacy accelerates the adoption of approaches that protect both sow and piglet welfare.

What You Can Do