The scientific evidence for fish pain and negative experience has strengthened considerably, with direct implications for how fisheries and aquaculture must be regulated.
Fish pain science has advanced dramatically in the past two decades, with evidence now sufficient to demand precautionary welfare consideration in fisheries and aquaculture. While philosophical certainty about fish conscious experience remains elusive, the behavioral, physiological, and neurological evidence for nociceptive experience is substantial. Welfare frameworks that treat fish as potentially sentient — implementing pain reduction in capture, handling, and slaughter — are scientifically justified and morally defensible. Regulatory reform that reflects the current state of fish pain science, rather than the dismissive consensus of decades past, is urgently needed.