Enrichment for pigs reduces aggression and stereotypies, but not all enrichments are equal. Evidence on what works best guides practical implementation.
Enrichment research for pigs has produced a clear hierarchy of effectiveness: rooting substrates are substantially superior to all other enrichment types, yet are the least commonly provided in commercial systems because they are incompatible with slatted floor management. This creates a practical tension: the enrichment that pigs value most conflicts with the housing system used most widely. Addressing this requires either changing housing (to solid or partially solid floors with substrate) or finding workable substrate delivery systems for slatted environments (e.g., substrate racks or enrichment blocks containing rooting material). The evidence base for pig enrichment is robust and practical, enabling evidence-based welfare standards rather than token compliance with vague "manipulable material" requirements.