As cities expand into wildlife habitat, conflicts with urban wildlife are increasing — prevention is more humane and effective than reactive removal.
Urban wildlife conflicts represent welfare challenges at the intersection of animal and human interests. Animals drawn into conflict situations by food attractants face lethal control, injury from encounters, or translocation to unfamiliar environments. Reactive removal rarely works since new animals move into available niches. Prevention through securing attractants, modifying landscaping, and community education addresses root causes. Tolerant, educated communities that coexist with urban wildlife provide better outcomes for animals and humans alike.