The economic case for transitioning from gestation stalls to group housing has strengthened as costs have come down and market premiums have increased.
The economic argument against gestation stall phase-out has weakened considerably as corporate commitments have created market premiums and transition costs have become better understood. Farms that have completed the transition and optimized management of group housing systems often report that the initial productivity concerns did not materialize. The market signal from over 60 major food company commitments represents a clear direction of travel that makes the business case for early transition increasingly compelling. Welfare advocates who engage with the economic dimensions of transition support more effective industry change.