The barefoot horse movement advocates removing metal shoes in favor of natural hoof management — a welfare and performance debate with genuine evidence on both sides.
Barefoot horse welfare requires avoiding both the dogmatic rejection of shoes as always harmful and the reflexive dismissal of barefoot as impractical. The evidence supports a nuanced view: barefoot management has genuine physiological benefits when horses have appropriate hoof condition, gradual transition, and lifestyle suited to barefoot work. The welfare harms can occur in both directions: ill-fitted metal shoes on inappropriate hoof angles cause chronic lameness, while premature barefoot transition on horses with inadequate hoof condition causes pain and injury. The individual horse, its workload, the terrain it works on, and the expertise of the trimmer or farrier all determine whether barefoot or shod management is welfare-positive. Owner decisions should be guided by objective evidence from their specific horse rather than movement ideology.