How to evaluate commercial dog food claims using nutritional science rather than marketing, and what evidence actually supports different diet types.
Dog nutrition is an area where marketing claims often vastly outrun scientific evidence, and where well-intentioned owners can inadvertently cause welfare harm by following trends rather than evidence. The grain-free diet movement, driven by anthropomorphizing assumptions about canine nutrition preferences, has generated plausible links to serious cardiac disease. Raw feeding, motivated by natural diet reasoning, creates documented infectious disease risks. Evaluating dog nutrition requires engaging with the actual evidence base rather than appealing to naturalness, ancestral diet logic or marketing language about premium ingredients. A welfare-centered approach to dog nutrition uses veterinary nutritionist guidance, AAFCO-approved complete and balanced formulations with feeding trial evidence, and scepticism toward unsubstantiated marketing claims.