Conflicts between bears and humans cause welfare harm to both species, and evidence-based coexistence strategies reduce suffering while protecting both bears and communities.
Wild bears involved in human conflict face a predictable welfare trajectory: food-conditioned bears that access garbage, bird feeders, and agricultural products become habituated to human presence, lose natural fear, and ultimately face lethal removal. This welfare outcome is largely preventable through community-level attractant management that removes the food reward driving conflict behavior. Individual bears killed for human food access have typically been set up for failure by human attractant provision — the welfare responsibility lies substantially with communities that fail to secure food sources. Addressing human-bear conflict through the coexistence lens — securing attractants, using exclusion tools, and applying aversive conditioning — protects both bear welfare and community safety.