Horse blanketing decisions affect welfare through thermal comfort, social behavior, and the risks of pressure rubs and restriction — evidence-based use improves outcomes.
Horse blanket welfare requires understanding that blanketing decisions have bidirectional welfare risks: under-rugging a clipped horse in cold conditions causes thermal discomfort, while over-rugging horses with intact coats in mild conditions causes heat stress. Both errors are common, with over-rugging particularly prevalent as owners anthropomorphize horse thermal needs based on human cold perception rather than equine physiology. Horses are remarkably well-adapted to cold — the bigger welfare risk is often overheating rather than chilling. Daily checking of rugged horses to verify fit, moisture levels, and thermal comfort, combined with adjusting layering to actual weather conditions, represents the welfare-centered blanketing approach.