Transitioning from absence-of-suffering frameworks to positive welfare requires developing and validating indicators of positive emotional states in farmed species.
The shift to positive welfare assessment represents the most significant conceptual advance in animal welfare science in recent decades. Previous frameworks focused exclusively on preventing suffering — disease, injury, hunger, and fear. While preventing these negatives is essential, it leaves a welfare ceiling far below what is achievable for sentient animals capable of experiencing not just the absence of suffering but genuine positive states. Play, exploration, social affiliation, anticipatory excitement, and cognitive engagement all represent positive welfare experiences that depend on environments providing appropriate opportunity. The practical challenge is developing indicators that are sufficiently reliable, practical, and applicable at farm scale to inform management and certification. Cognitive bias testing shows particular promise as a validated tool, though its practical application at farm scale requires simplification. The welfare policy implication is clear: standards that only measure deficits leave achievable welfare gains uncaptured.