Catch-and-release fishing is widely practiced as a conservation measure, but its welfare implications for fish are increasingly scrutinized.
Catch-and-release fishing welfare is contested at two levels: whether fish experience meaningful suffering from the process, and whether release justifies the welfare cost even if suffering occurs. Evidence of fish nociception and stress responses has strengthened the welfare concern. The practical welfare case focuses on minimizing harm through barbless hooks, minimal air exposure, cold water handling, and rapid release. Post-release mortality data shows that best-practice handling produces substantially better outcomes than careless practice. For anglers committed to catch-and-release, welfare-focused technique is both ethically important and practically achievable without sacrificing the recreational experience.