Long-distance livestock transport causes measurable physiological and psychological stress, with transport duration, stocking density, and rest stop management critically determining welfare outcomes.
Livestock transport welfare reflects the tension between economic efficiency, which favors longer journeys to larger facilities, and animal welfare, which deteriorates with journey duration and poor conditions. The welfare science is clear: journey duration correlates with welfare impact in a dose-dependent relationship. Rest stops that are genuinely adequate for recovery rather than minimal compliance provide real welfare benefit. Journey temperature management, particularly preventing heat accumulation in poorly ventilated vehicles during summer transport, prevents acute welfare crises. Consumer preference for locally sourced meat creates market incentives that reduce transport distances and their associated welfare costs.