Comparing electrical and controlled atmosphere stunning methods for poultry welfare at slaughter.
The choice of stunning method at poultry slaughter has significant welfare implications for hundreds of billions of birds annually. Water bath electrical stunning, while widely used, involves the welfare-compromising step of shackling conscious birds upside-down before stunning, and carries a risk of inadequate stunning. Controlled atmosphere systems eliminate shackling pain but their welfare quality depends heavily on the specific gas mixture and concentrations used. Nitrogen or argon-based systems consistently outperform CO2 on welfare measures. The welfare investment in improving stunning technology is justified by the scale of poultry slaughter globally.