The barefoot movement advocates keeping horses without metal horseshoes, allowing natural hoof function. Evidence suggests barefoot management benefits many horses when conditions and diet are appropriate.
The barefoot debate reflects a broader tension in equine management between tradition, practicality, and evidence-based welfare. The physiological evidence that metal shoes restrict natural hoof function is strong. Whether this restriction constitutes a welfare harm depends on the context — a leisure horse on soft ground may be better served barefoot, while a performance horse on hard or varied terrain may need the protection shoes provide. A nuanced, horse-centered approach that considers individual conformation, workload, and management conditions is preferable to rigid position-taking on either side.