Comparing major aquaculture certification schemes on fish welfare criteria and what gaps remain in current certification standards.
Aquaculture certification occupies an uneasy position between genuine welfare improvement and greenwashing. For consumers seeking to make welfare-informed seafood choices, certification provides imperfect but meaningful information — ASC-certified salmon is produced under better conditions on average than uncertified alternatives, even though ASC standards fall short of what fish welfare science considers adequate. The most significant gap is slaughter welfare: killing fish by asphyxiation on ice — the most common method even in certified systems — causes significant suffering that is incompatible with standards applied to terrestrial species. Certification bodies face commercial pressure to maintain broad industry adoption, creating a structural tension with welfare advocacy for higher standards.