Tail docking in piglets is performed to prevent tail biting but represents a painful procedure that addresses a symptom of inadequate environments, with EU regulations requiring justification and encouraging elimination.
Tail docking welfare analysis mirrors the beak trimming debate: a painful procedure justified as preventing a more severe welfare harm (tail biting leading to wounds and cannibalism). The regulatory framework in the EU is clear - routine docking is prohibited - but enforcement is essentially absent, making the prohibition rhetorical. The welfare case for eliminating tail docking requires simultaneously eliminating the conditions that drive tail biting: overcrowding, enrichment deprivation, and nutritional inadequacy. Scandinavian countries demonstrate commercial viability of intact-tailed production, refuting the argument that docking is an unavoidable necessity. The path forward requires both regulatory enforcement and investment in the system changes that make enforcement feasible.